Tag: media

  • What Does a Good Media Experience Look Like?

    What Does a Good Media Experience Look Like?

    One of the things I wanted to do more of this year is explore photography. Sometimes I worry that creating a photo editing app and writing a book chapter about creating image filters sucked some of the joy from photography for me. I wanted to do more with my pictures for their own sake, rather than just because I was trying to feed a Tumblr. I also find that I post pictures in the moment (on Twitter), or not at all. There are well over 7K photos on my iPhone – I’m sure many of them are worth revisiting.

    Part of the reason for this is that uploading photos to my blog became more painful when iPhoto became Photos, and now my workflow involves right clicking to get the filename and then searching for the picture in Finder. I used to create really image heavy posts, like the ones from North Korea, but at some point I stopped. I shared pictures on Twitter, or not at all. I didn’t keep my Flickr stream updated. I took lots of photos, and then just… kept them synced between device and computer.

    So, I decided to play more with media this year. I downloaded an app with all these filters (and actually paid for it!) and I’m playing with it and with more intensely filtered images (including super fake ones, like the one above [original]). I also set up photo.cate.blog which I think of as my “mobile only” blog. I did the most basic site creation on my laptop (Pressable + Jetpack + Feedburner) and now I am restricting myself to mobile devices to change it. I’ve been alternating posting from my Pixel and my iPhone. I tend to take more photos on my iPhone, so there I have a rich set to choose from. Pixel photos are more in the moment and encourages me to try and find something worth capturing even on a more “boring” day.

    I also started using (urgh) Instagram. I haven’t logged into it on my computer – there’s been no need to. But I did run into a couple of things: Create an account with Facebook didn’t work on Android (did on iOS), and their onboarding tutorial wasn’t updated when they changed the UI. I’m posting the same photos to Instagram as I post to photo.cate.blog. Instagram did a pretty thorough job of spamming all my friends and now I feel obliged to keep using it, even though I can’t do what I want to on it (automate posting from photo.cate.blog, because of their TOS). I don’t think anyone knew about photo.cate.blog, because I didn’t connect it to social media or tell anyone about it. I wanted to see if I could stick with it for a month first.

    One of the things this made me realize is that I have a set of expectations around media, and I’ve been thinking about what those are.

    Media is a feature where:

    • I expect a better experience on mobile than on the desktop – Apple and Google photos are both better on mobile and easier to integrate into apps than desktop web.
    • It suits the capabilities of the phone – it’s easier to take a picture and add a caption on the phone. It’s easier to write long form on a computer. A tablet is somewhere in between for both (although I often see people using tablets as cameras when I’m exploring).
    • Photo and mobile are synonymous. The iPhone has been one of the most popular cameras on Flickr for years. Newer Android devices also have amazing cameras – the Pixel has a great camera, I really like it.

    What Does a “Good” Media Experience Look Like?

    • It’s easy to upload multiple images from device.
    • I can add media from my existing media (on that platform) easily.
    • I can create galleries of images.
    • If there’s a limit on how many images I can upload at once, that’s clear.
    • I can see what I’m uploading before I upload it.
    • The app handles intermittent network access and retries are easy.
    • Uploading images doesn’t block me from doing other activities.
    • It’s easy to add captions, a11y labels etc.
    • It remembers my preferences.

    What Does a “Great” Media Experience Look Like?

    • I can choose which image is featured (when that item is shared elsewhere, e.g. on Twitter).
    • It’s easy to upload images from anywhere (the camera roll, other apps, the web, URLs).
    • I can upload as many images as I want.
    • I can do some editing of my images: crop, filter etc.
      • If I edit them, edits happen before upload so my device remains a source of truth (or it’s made easy to save locally).
    • I can upload images in the background.
    • It’s easy to keep my place in my photo roll.
    • I can search by location or time.

    I’m curious about other people’s experiences here – what’s your favourite app for sharing images? What do you love about it?

  • Why Are We Still Geeks – Panel at GHC

    Why Are We Still Geeks – Panel at GHC

    Fortune Most Powerful Women Dinner With Marissa Mayer
    Credit: Flickr / Fortune Live Media

    Marie Klawe

    Been worried about image in the media for 20 years. Been working on it, but no progress. But “if you don’t even try, you definitely won’t succeed”. Had many failures, but getting closer to success.

    There used to be very few female lawyers and doctors, now it’s 50%. Still not reaching power – see the low number of female deans of med schools. In the 1970s, there were TV shows with male and female factors, and male and female lawyers – e.g. LA Law. They were portrayed as people making a difference, with interesting jobs and personal lives. They were attractive, and empathetic. Women flooded into these professions, and girls doing well thought about law and medicine as their careers.

    Now it’s forensic shows.

    Being a doctors or a lawyers isn’t really as interesting, not as interesting as CS. High levels of debt, long time to qualify, and lousy pay. There are more opportunities in CS than forensics.

    Media portrayal dramatically affects high school students. It really matters. Even if you really like CS, other people have the image that it is boring and uncreative – that matters.

    This underrepresentation is not just technical women, but women in general. The Gina Davis studies found that men are the main characters, and women are dressed sexily. Also technical men – see NCIS are portrayed as having no social like. They are OK-looking, but dress nerdy. Big Bang Theory – love the show, but it’s doing a terrible disservice to science and engineering. In Friends, Chandler had a job so boring that none could remember what it was. It was “data processor”, essentially CS. The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is great with computers, but also really weird.

    Mid-1990s, met a NBC exec for saturday night movie series. Told him that they needed movies and series showing women as engineering, empathetic and doing interesting things with their lives.

    Raised money for a pilot, wrote it, working with a CS person turned screenwriter. They were jumping out of helicopters, no connection. Saw it wasn’t going anywhere.

    Mentions a TV series showing computer scientists doing interesting fun things. Email from Bob Quin – Rush. Startup in Sillicon Valley. Loved it, sent it to 20 people. Brad Weshler Co-CEO of IMAX, passed it on again – loved it. Went nowhere, have to get a channel to pick it up.

    It will eventually happen. People now realise that tech is changing the world.

    Megan Smith and people at Google are doing things, but personally out of ideas.

    Tried hard! Emailed with James Cameron. But getting nowhere.

    Brenda Laural

    Founder of  Purple Moon – amazing woman, my favourite panelist this year.

    The Star Trek reboot. Hated turning women from competent into a “wimpy slut”.

    Start at home, looking at the GHC 2012 image – there are power and racial issues there. Changes it up to put the Black woman in the centre, speaking, and gives the Asian woman Glass so “she has something to look at” (original shows her staring into space).

    We are responsible for our own representation – likes the way we look.

    Put out and hold up our self-representation. Deny power to the spectacle (how we look, speaks).

    There’s an inverse relationship between family income and desire for a Louis Vuitton bag amongst high school girls.

    Do great work and get noticed for it. Self promotion is good.

    Taking action – Wikipedia Storming (FemTechNet).

    Kim Surkan

    Hard not to feel disempowered when talking about women in the media. Unclothed. Objectified.

    Feminist Media Studies is growing. Media consumption is growing. Average is now >7 hours a day (much of it while multitasking).

    Stereotypes affect perceptions and performance. Self-fulfilling prophecies.

    Easier to protest a bad image, than an image that isn’t there.

    So much time on the TV/internet, that the space between lived reality and media is blurred. Result is decreased self-esteem.

    “Stepping out into your world, found your world is troubled” – on women in CS. BS levels in CS are declining.

    Women in the 1940s were part of the war effort, lots of women working at Bletchley Park.

    There is and extreme culture of sexism and anti-Feminism in CS, especially in gaming. The shift from geek to bro, supposed to appeal to younger men, it seems sexier. Women are 5% of people starting tech companies, the rise of frat culture in Silicon Valley. Recruitment materials alienate women, and hackathons, like TC disrupt.

    When women complain, they become the targets of hate speech. E.g. Anita Sarkesian, and Adria Richards.

    Women are reluctant role models, like Marissa Mayer.

    The backlash effect is harnessed to benefit, but why do women need to turn to kickstarted to start their companies?