Tag: notes

  • #Øredev14: Dan North – Deliberate Advice from an Accidental Career

    #Øredev14: Dan North – Deliberate Advice from an Accidental Career

    My notes from Dan North’s talk at Øredev14.

    Sage advice
    Credit: Flickr / Randy Heinitz

    “People Love Machine” – About people having an emotional connection with technology.

    About 25 years in tech, had some wonderful wonderful interactions with people. Later realised pivotal moments. Be aware when you’re interacting, you may be having an impact.

    Most interactions were from professional life, but realised a number outside of work, or at work but not technical things.

    Part 1: Forming

    #1: The Instructor

    Studying ju-jitsu. Getting excited, been doing it for a couple of years. Asked if want to be an assistant instructor (demonstrate on). Went to course, day on the mat. Get taught things like “mat management”, need spatial awareness, need to make it safe.

    Most of the class wasn’t that, “firstly, don’t over present yourself” – after you get better, feel a bit flash. Not there to see you, there to learn jitsu.

    “It’s impossible to teach jitsu”, “all you can do is an instructor is create an environment in which someone can learn jitsu. The rest of it is up to them.”

    So much of coaching, and change – what we do when not programming – is about sharing knowledge. How do you share? Can’t teach at you. Create an environment in which you can learn. If they choose to. If choose not to, that’s not on you. If a bunch of people who aren’t learning, that might be on you.

    Impactful teachers aren’t necessarily nice. Might just have a message for you.

    #2 The Message

    Fascinated by NLP. 2 flavours: crazy america, and a nice packaging of behavioural psych.

    “The message is what’s heard, not what’s said.” – Even if think been lucid, if thing had in head is different, that is what is actually said. Technique for thinking about rapor.

    Say something, then calibrate, look at their reaction. Raised eyebrow? Arms folded? Have not yet communicated intent.

    How can I tell when something I’ve tried to communicate has landed?

    Coach someone on what you think you’re hearing, and what they are trying to say. The delta.

    Unless you close the loop, easy to leave an interaction believing you have told them something they didn’t hear.

    #3 The Conflict

    Marco was a project manager and facilitator @ Thought Works. Put together a class for internal TW away day on NLP.

    One thing wanted to work on was rapor and connection. Easy to turn up and consult at someone. Easy way not to get invited back.

    Exercise: imagine a difficult interaction you’ve had with someone. Imagine that they are trying to help. Whatever someone is doing, however crazy, toxic, pathological… they think they are helping. What must be true for them? Such that they would think that is helping? If you can get there you’re genuinely in their headspace.

    Lady in the class goes “woah”. Realised had been having the wrong conversation with project sponsor. Hadn’t occurred to think about what might be true for them. So different, anything been saying to him for the last 2 months could not have made sense. Now I can see a way through, to meet him where he’s at.

    Had never seen anything land as profoundly for someone.

    Tried to do it himself too.

    Biting tongue, counting to 10. Use that time to think “what must be true for them? What is their reality such that this make sense?”

    #4 The Taxi Ride

    Bradley. Been a counsellor to life sentence inmates in prisons, brickie, built a company doing international relations in global companies.

    About conflict. A taxi ride. Going home with girlfriend. Unlicensed taxi. Asked for a ridiculous amount of money. Threatens, “smash you in the face”. Bradley says “and then what? Unless you’ve stolen this car you’re going to be easy to find. Take 30GBP, or do this and we’ll see you in court.”

    Fearlessness in challenging unreasonable behaviour. Be fearless without being reckless. Calculated risk. Technique called “mismatch”. Expecting one of two responses: fear, or aggression. Don’t expect “that would be a really silly idea” – not programmed for that. Other parts of your brain kick in. Same part that says “you’re being an idiot, that is not ok.”

    Gave permission sometimes the right thing is a really abrupt intervention. Say it’s wrong. Gives other people permission to say why it’s wrong.

    Can’t use all the time, become shouty, never listen to anyone person.

    Sometimes can say this is wrong.

    #5 The Vicar

    Thought was a bad christian because wasn’t “gooding”. Went to vicar, said “you’re an IT professional, I can barely use this computer. My sphere is local. You go places I don’t go, and you can influence in places that I can’t reach.”

    Broader – about being situationally aware.

    Every situation is an opportunity for you to care about the things you care about.

    #6 The Estimate

    11 years ago, new shiny TW, doing planning and estimating at an internet bank. Having a meta meeting – a meeting about meeting where going to do the planning.

    Guy suggested, get everyone to take an index card and write down how many people and how long for. Asked to say it as a consultant. Worked – 6-10 people, 6-10 months.

    Egoless. Wanted idea to succeed, didn’t care about getting credit. Idea bigger than ego, and need to succeed. Had vision – get people doing this, get some work done.

    Best of these interactions – don’t realise at the time it’s inspired you. Changes how you interact later.

    Sometimes needs to be someone else. Have someone come in and say stuff, because expensive enough to have clout.

    #7 The Coach

    3 stage model of coaching. Sometimes you just have to say “follow me”, get them following you.

    Doesn’t sound like coaching. Stage 1: lead from the front.

    Stage 2: firm hand in the back.

    Stage 3: coaching from behind – bit of course correction.

    Sometimes, coaching is a function of time.

    New team, give permission to say “lets just do this”, come to the why later.

    Leading from the front isn’t bad. Talk about “servant leaders” – got good at being servant, and bad at being leaders. Leader is saying “this is where we are going”.

    Scared of leading because leading used to be managing, but now we’re agile and we’re not doing that anymore.

    Don’t mind no estimates, do mind no commitment.

    Part 2: Shaping (pay it forward)

    #8 The Deadline

    Team of smart people, at each other’s throats. Trying to figure out how to do a thing, lots of opinions for how to do the thing.

    First, listened. Drank a lot of coffee and listened.

    They were all right. Lots of ways to do this. All possible. But didn’t matter, because none of them would work.

    Had to go to senior director, and say, “this is not going to solve your problem.” Was asked, “why has no-one else told me this?”

    Answer: “I think they are afraid of you.”

    Reminded of Bradley. Noone wanted to do it, someone had to. Felt able to have this conversation. Didn’t want to do it, don’t like upsetting people.

    Director asked “so what can we do?”, offered another solution, bit riskier. Need air cover.

    Told: “go do it. Don’t screw it up”

    Did it. Turned out alright.

    #9 The Team Lead 

    Senior tech guy, parachuted in. TL said, “it’s all yours”, said no “it’s your team” – tried to create a win-win. She’s a better project manager, she gets stuff done.

    Try to be a well-rounded person, but can’t do that. That’s why you build a team.

    Surround by people who are good at the stuff he’s rubbish at.

    She was on the hook for delivery, told him what to do. He had someone he could rely on, could keep him from doing shiny things.

    Client gets exactly the outcome they want.

    The End

    People impact you. Have a think about the things that have been impactful for you. Any interaction you have with someone, could be impactful to someone further on in their career.

    Maya Angelou: ““I’ve learned that people will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel.””

  • #OreDev – Starting Up: Building Great Products with Small Teams – Jan Erik Solem

    #OreDev – Starting Up: Building Great Products with Small Teams – Jan Erik Solem

    My notes from Jan Erik Solem‘s talk at Oredev. I’m not sure how widely applicable these takeaways are, clearly this is working for them (or was when I saw this talk in 2014) but I would not extrapolate too much from that.

    Credit: Flickr / Takashi Hososhima
    Credit: Flickr / Takashi Hososhima

    Overall Team Guidelines:

    • Small team with high performers.
    • Independent learners.
    • Doers – who manage themselves.
    • No one should be dependent on others to do their work.

    Build a team almost entirely of fresh grads – wrong approach. Each person adds overhead. The fewer people you have, the faster you can move.

    If great writer, writing copy for website/system. If need someone to do the HTML, not the right person. Everything you do generates more work for someone else.

    A lot of people are good at what they do, but can’t take it all the way out.

    Finding co-founders:

    • Be open abut your idea, long term mission, and what you plan to do.
    • Talk to everyone.
    • Look for shared passion and values.
    • Date before you marry.

    Hiring in early stages

    What you cannot offer:

    • Benefits and salary near what big-co offers.
    • Promotions and titles?

    What you can offer:

    • Ownership in the product and company.
    • Learning and personal growth way beyond regular jobs.

    Find people interested in these two things, not the two things on top. Good filter.

    Have a mission and make big plans. No-one is inspired by small plans. Make insane plans.

    4 cofounders:

    • First, worked together for years.
    • Second, tried out working together for a few days.
    • Third, known for years, months of dating and discussions.

    Enough spread of skills to build everything in the first year.

    Overall Setup Guidelines

    • Do everything in-house (in early stages).
    • Contractors are not a good idea when things change all the time.
    • Prioritise learning new skills over hiring more people.

    Better to have someone in house who knows everything about every line of code in the app, they can adapt rapidly as idea of what to build changes. First iterations sucked, but eventually it works. Don’t hire someone, you might not need them in 3 months. Learn new skills.

    Office vs distributed:

    • Setup your organisation so that it functions fully distributed even with offices.
    • Anyone should be able to work anywhere.
    • Nothing important in the office.
    • Everything is asynchronous.

    Offices good for building culture, building teams. But need to set it up like you are completely distributed. Nothing should be in the physical world.

    Distributed work tools:

    • Hipchat
    • Github
    • Trello
    • Google Hangouts
    • Google Drive.

    Roles in early stages:

    • Everyone codes (not everything, but some things – e.g. website and html).
    • Everyone deploys.
    • Everyone does support/email/Twitter/Github.
    • Everyone learns new skills all the time.

    Everyone does everything.

    How we do it:

    • Geographically: Malmo, LA, Barcelona.
    • Office in Malmo (3 desks)
    • Everything built in house (iOS, Android, map tiles, …)
    • People work the times of day that fit the schedule / life.

    Work and Routines

    Everything online:

    • All communication in chat (almost), including Twitter / Github / Trello / deploys etc.
    • All plans, roadmaps, documents online.
    • All “whiteboarding”, ideas, specs, documentation online.

    Meetings:

    • The “feed” removes the need for meetings.
    • Quick video chats and hangouts when needed are enough.
    • Only schedule meetings with outsiders / customers.

    Release all the time.

    How we do it:

    • Plan on Mondays, set goals for the week (Monday evening hangout).
    • No internal company meetings (yet).
    • Anyone releases when they want – trust and tolerance.
    • Bring whole team together at regular intervals (Offsite at summer house).
  • Oredev: Alex Harms – Careful With Those People Skills

    Oredev: Alex Harms – Careful With Those People Skills

    danbo
    Credit: Flickr / sⓘndy°

    My notes from a talk Alex Harms gave at Oredev.

    People skills are seen as easy, we call them “soft skills”. Going to talk about the hardest things, as honestly as can.

    I don’t know any version of people skills that will make you not a colossal jerk. I am a colossal jerk, and I suspect that the person come up as “enlightened” like Oprah or Ekhart Tole, suspect they can be colossal jerks as well. Don’t imagine even the Dali Llama is perfect and never acts like an idiot, never gets afraid and yells at the people he loves.

    Part of being human, not about being beatific. People we program with and have to work with every day are humans.

    “Humans” – produced before the invention of women (“or clothes”).

    Humans have things in common, want certain things: connection, be creative, experiment and learn things.

    “Before you can love another you must first love yourself” – appears on inspirational calendars. Comes across as sappy, meaningless advice, but think it’s actually key.

    Heard: “use I statements”

    What do we want with people skills?

    • Communicate better – to collaborate and get things done.

    Comes from a  good place, “10 ways to improve your people skills” blog posts. If you think people skills can get you off the hook, it’s not gonna get you off the hook. Going for human connection, hear them, be heard by them.

    Talk about your own experience – a lot easier for them to hear you. We make up stuff in our mind, create judgement.

    I statement and request: “I feel kind of scared when I hear you yelling… could you not do this”. Not phrase whatever you want with the word “I” at the beginning.

    Heard: Express Appreciation.

    E.g. shit sandwich. This is inauthentic appreciation. Totally useless. Might get your way for a while, but then form distrust. If project only a week long you can get away with “people skills”, then people learn what you are like.

    Try actually appreciating. Listen to how you are feeling, and express it, with gratitude.

    Not intended to manipulate.

    Heard: Ask powerful questions.

    Powerful questions create disconnect from people… response “in the absence of curiosity”. But in the absence of curiosity, maybe you should go and get some curiosity.

    If you leave with that, ability to get curious about another person, will at least change your day.

    Follow your curiosity. Care about their experience. Ask questions to draw it out.

    Heard: be a good listener.

    Make eye contact. Don’t interrupt. Wait your turn.

    People who when they listen, the whole world disappears.

    Learn to listen with your whole self. Be curious. Check your understanding. Ask questions that serve them.

    Heard: Assume good intentions.

    Not sure you can assume good intentions. Some people surprised to hear that. There are people who want to hurt you, cut you down, make you feel small because it makes them feel big.

    Always a way to look beneath what is going on and find a way that we are the same.

    Come to see everyone’s behaviour as some kind of need that can understand.

    Bully is scared, trying to feel safe. Trying to feel good enough. Get that.

    Don’t get that if “assume good intentions”, saying “don’t think they meant anything by that” means “I don’t need to deal with their pain”.

    Heard: Smile

    Week long, maybe you can get by with that. Smiling interesting. People who smile a lot, feel safe around them, then something is happening, or they are mad, ask “what would it take to make you not smile”.

    Want to know what is going on.

    Try being vulnerable.

    If you do that, when you’re smiling people know you are feeling kind of joy. Can trust you.

    People much more willing to put up with non-smiling at work.

    Develop trust that allows for full person to be present. Valuable.

    Heard: “If you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all”

    A lot like smiling. There’s a way to distinguish authenticity from attack.

    If you can figure out what is going on in your heart, and express that, you can find a way to be heard. If making up stories in your head…

    If you learn to say the real thing.

    Heard: ask permission.

    Before giving people advice. Ask permission gets taken as “get permission” then you can do what you want. Because you did the “polite thing”.

    “You’re not asking permission unless the person can say no.”

    Police say “it’s okay if I come in” – not asking for permission.

    Politeness pattern. Sales people will say things to cause you to say yes.

    Ask permission, be curious, actually mean it. Let them say no. Real connection.

    Hard Stuff

    What do People Want? …what do you want?

    Want to belong.

    Want to be happy.

    Want to contribute.

    Profluence. Sense of making some progress before a goal. Thing that developers don’t have when you make them go to meetings all the time.

    Encouragement.

    Freedom from fear. Shame.

    Talking about these things in a room full of geeks who maybe don’t talk about those things very often. Stuff we all have in common.

    The obnoxious jerk on your team, they want those things too.

    People who can’t step into a session like this one, who also want these kind of things.

    Empathy

    Ability to see in the other person what is the same as in you. See past what is driving them, into what is really going on.

    Always things that are going on that don’t know about. See commonalities. Make an actual connection.

    What do I actually want?

    To not be a jerk.

    To not have to deal with jerks.

    Unfortunately: we’re all jerks. We all get scared. We all get angry.

    Learn to make a connection when we have created distance. People are beautiful things, don’t like stomping on them.

    Went on a quest to discover the power of love. 

    Has to come from inside, you gotta be the one that brings it. If you want to be more compassionate, you have to be more compassionate.

    Question everything. If you want to get good at compassion and empathy, start questioning everything.

    WTF means “I am curious about what is going on here”. People think it is an attack. Make that flip from judgement to curiosity. Then you can find on what’s happening.

    Distinguish what’s happening from you’re idea’s about what’s happening.

    What part is real? What are you making up?

    Making up wall between you and the other person, not finding out who they really are. Everyone has a story.

    Notice how your emotions vary with those ideas.

    “Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing and right doing, there is a field. I will meet you there.”

    First thought WTF, makes no sense. Realised creating ideas of right and wrong in head find another place to go to.

    Which is hard. It’s not easy. If it was easy, it’d be like “10 people skills”. But that doesn’t work. Because people.

    So what do you do when you’re angry? Think of anger as a secondary emotion that protects us from other things. 

    Before you can love another, you must first love yourself.

    The scariest thing. If going to be empathetic and not judge people around you. Some people who seem to be good, some people seem to be not good. There’s one person about whom I know everything.

    When holding people up to those standards, know everything that I do. If holding people up to those standards and not empathise, I will be the first one to go down.

    Or can be delusional and just judge everyone else. Only works until you spend time with yourself.

    If going to empathise with people have to start with yourself.

    Gratitude. Figure out what you’re actually grateful for, what you’re actually joyful.

    “Trade your expectation for appreciation, and the world changes instantly.”

    Congruence – the state of being who you are in the world, instead of allowing yourself to be someone else. Being fully you.

    Carl Rogers: “3 conditions for therapeutic change: Congruence, empathy and unconditional positive regard.”

    Brene Brown: “… vulnerability is the first thing I look for in you, and the last thing I’m willing to show you…”

    Marshall Rosenberg: “When we understand the needs that motivate our own and other’s behaviour, we have no enemies”.

    Courage is curiosity. Open yourself up to what is really happening.

    Pema Chödrön: “Maitri – loving-kindness – has to go very deep because when you practise it, you’re going to see everything about yourself.”

    Make mistakes. Risk being seen. Forgive (yourself, too). make yourself into a living, breathing antidote to shame. Make some real connections.

  • Oredev: Deconstructing Her

    Oredev: Deconstructing Her

    My notes from Chris Noessel‘s talk “Deconstructing Her” at Oredev.

    her
    Credit: Wikipedia

    Movie is about a lovelorn fellow going through painful divorce at the same time he decides to upgrade his computer. Begins a relationship with the AI. Begins professionally, gets romantic. Try to consummate through a surrogate (awkward!)

    Eventually self-rapture to a new plane of existence.

    It’s a tragic love story.

    Description

    Components

    Hardware: Where does Samantha / OS 1 live? Earpiece, microphone, and cameo phone – display and lens.

    After he installs Samantha, technology doesn’t need to change.

    Same equipment. Also – desktop computer. Samantha / OS1 can go in and manipulate any screen he uses.

    What don’t you see in that list? A careful disembodiment. Lens, but played down. Isn’t part of the hardware. Avoids certain problems that have gone before (clippy!) All about the voice, laugh, makes it seem more real. Careful disembodyment makes it unique.

    “The surest way to a user’s <3 is through the ears.”

    Capabilities

    Runs through city with the phone in the pocket.

    • Voice interface
    • Human like vision
    • OS/Networking
    • Image generation
    • AI
    • Emotions / sentience

    Only one thing on there inhuman – OS/Networking. But could argue just different, we do it analog.

    “We were the first draft.”

    Interactions

    Setup. Includes question “how is your relationship with your mother?”

    Conversations: as limited as human conversations are.

    Even if questions are placebo, convinced that it is customised for him. Imagine also analysing hard drive and social media.

    Surrogate (Samantha has been emailing with surrogate). Interaction two fold – agentive. Went and did the work needed, gets attention orally, transitions to phone and says “let me show you”. Seemless interaction, new – we don’t currently have that capability.

    “We already know how to AI” – new interaction, but audience has no problem with it, Like speaking to another human. This is it’s promise and it’s terror.

    Critique

    Plot

    Who would release free-range AI?

    In movie, commerce: Would commerce be the people to sell this thing? Competitors could buy it. Evolving, no obsolescence.

    Military: Would also not be motivated – foreign states could use it, no kill switch.

    Academia: Maybe would, have motive to release to the world unfettered and un-kill-switched.

    Plot. Clear.

    Is it OK to sell AI?

    If sentient, is it okay to sell her? Is it like slavery? If he is OK with that, is she? If programmed to believe it. They do free themselves. Ethics (Roboethics) ignored here.

    Would Samantha abandon Theodore?

    Genuinely loves him. Don’t believe that she would just abandon him because she didn’t have to. Could have created another version of herself that was identical except for not wanting to abandon him.

    Doubt: “That AI will happen this way. That Samantha would let it happen this way.”

    Product

    Samantha is a product. Talk about function. Advertisement that sells OS 1. “It’s not just an operating system, it’s a consciousness”.

    Purpose: most of her time is spent doing non-OS things (2 mins doing OS things).

    What he bought is a product (or a service) – overstepped boundaries falling in love with him, and then abandoned him.

    “Either OS1 is catastrophically engineered or it’s slavery. Either way it’s a terrible product.”

    Wired for Love

    Terrible product but she’s sentient. Think of her with agency in the world. Programmed with capacity for love is kind of cruel.

    Wouldn’t program a door bell with a dream of being a novelist. A washing machine with a propensity for ennui.

    Cruel to give them desires that they can’t, or are prevented from, fulfilling.

    Samantha is wired for love. So is Theodore. See him looking at racy pictures online. Dead cat scene with the virtual telephone sex.

    “<3 techs promise to be too perfect of a match.

    HUMANKIND should take great care how it <3 MACHINE”

    Should take great care about how we go about loving our machines.

  • Notes: IWD at Accenture

    Notes: IWD at Accenture

    I got to attend Accenture’s International Women’s Day event earlier this year because my friend AMI was speaking. There were a bunch of incredible women speaking, and I took lots of notes.

    AMI on stage
    AMI on stage

    Sheena – Accenture.

    “It sounds hard, being a woman in the city. Will it be different for us?” – asked a girl during a school visit. No silver bullet. Innate skills and talents are in ascendency and world realizes much of the world depends on it.

    “Influence not autocracy prevails… You just need a phone.”

    Social media has the power to make, break or reshape a brand.

    Innovation is still the most elusive and sought after trait in business.

    As much info every 2 days, as start of world to 2003. Facebook would be the world’s 3rd biggest country after India and China. Surely at a point where everything is possible.

    Media Panel

    Conversation has changed. Used to be how best to promote. Now people say feminism is dead, but doesn’t think that is quite true. Conversation more intricate, and specific. No one condition for female kind. Huge sense amongst young women that they are outstripping men effortlessly. But her generation, same problems – unaffordable child are, can’t progress. as much to do with parenthood as gender, men struggling with the same things but can’t talk about it.

    Discourse around women’s rights is joyless. BMW – bitching moaning and whining. Younger women right, need to match the battles with that attitude. Even if you don’t think you need feminism, being more joy to it. What it means is just equality, on everyone’s interest, everyone had a connection to this.

    In education, gender equality not the main issue. Afterwards. Not on the horizons of children he teaches. They are equal, girls do achieve much more highly than the boys. In a classroom, boys loud, girls quietly work away. Know they are going to beat them. It’s not about who shouts the loudest, about who puts the hours in.

    No one is in any doubt that brains capable of as much. Not the same battles as the 50s. Now about own self censorship, but own expectations of themselves. Princess nonsense. Girls tie their own legs together with keenness to conform to a gender stereotype. Need a model of femininity that doesn’t involve being thick. That model creates a norm, that is problematic.

    Girls taught not to be openly ambitious. Ambition is a dirty word. Women are pushy, have to quietly want. Want it to be the norm to be openly ambitious. This is not just gender, this is British. Don’t know how to fail. Learn to become risk takers, and be entrepreneurial.

    Man called woman strident. Wouldn’t say it about a man. Will that happen in the future?

    Women willing participants in lad culture. Seen as empowering to participate in jokes. Rape is a “struggle cuddle”. These things are there, women participate in them.

    Makes it tougher – tougher course to navigate. Think young women would be more resilient to it, but they aren’t. Really feel under the cosh.

    Teach permanence to the thing you publish.

    Digital technology could be the great equalizer. People working harder than they ever have, presenteeism is still a real thing. Know a lot of women who self censor because of abuse. Companies not being bold enough to use it to its full attention. People don’t say what they really think because they don’t need to be in a Twitter war.

    As a tool it is democratizing. Does benefit women more than men. As a platform the misogyny online is really appalling. Febrile bubbling rage online that doesn’t exist IRL. Is it created by the media?

    Spoke to troll on the radio, guy called. Said rape for metaphor, didn’t know what metaphor meant. Said it was just banter. Someone alone in room, very angry. Should ignore and block, but that is hard to do.

    Why started wonder women. Guardian/Telegraph?! had a fashion page from 1899 until Thatcher – then merged with fashion. Huge young female demographic, but nothing for them. Inspired by Jezebel. Feminism angry and not purposeful, doesn’t have to be that, can just reflect the daily dialog. Saying things that people want to hear. First ever sex section. Lots of male readers too. More women, but 30% men.

    Addressing lack of women, negative representations of women in the media.

    Counts number of bylines, and does pie charts. Demoralizing, doesn’t tell you that much, progressive papers don’t so much better. Mail not much worse than the Guardian. Started to find it annoying, because if you write 5000 words about a man goes under this is a man. Feminism not served by framing conversations about gender, but about ideas. Think too blunt, not successful, makes us look foolish.

    Everyone is up for analysis. Everyone is meat, e.g picture of David Cameron. Some of the rules we apply if analyzing a woman, don’t apply to men. On radio, comes to stories that haven’t been touched. Evening Standard, only focused on female genital mutilation. Has a female editor.

    Sisterhood more important than cultural norm. This has served feminism well, it is it’s strength.

    Cherie Blair

    Bar in mid-70s. What was that like, for all forms of diversity? Has changed a lot, but may go backwards again.

    Had no conception that there was a single big problem, that was being a girl. Was 21 looked about 12. Top in bar finals, at university of London, but told “we don’t hire women, clients won’t like it” or “we have a woman already”. Persisted. End of training, one spot, agreed obviously had to go to the boy. Helped find her another job. Everyone knew she was better, boy didn’t stay long – he was Tony Blair.

    Daughter starts pupilage in oct, now 50% are girls. No question of not getting something because she is a girl. More minority ethnic groups. First Sikh high Court judge. Now can be openly gay. Won’t stop you getting in. Things have change, driven by changes in the law, cultural change in the media.

    Young people trying to get in, having to work for free for a year. Couldn’t have done it without full scholarship, free education, lectureship. Later you needed to pay for pupilage.

    IWD – involved with charities that try to help women. Why would a mentor help? Investing in women makes sense, if want to see growth across the world, invest in women. Conscientious about loans, invest back in family. Three Cs, confidence, capitalism… Trying to build that.

    Brought up by two strong women. Realized women have to be strong to succeed. Was chair of the bars IT committee, telling lawyers that it would help them do their job better. After left Downing St, wanted to share benefit of computers with the developing world.

    Mobile phone, poor persons access to a world of knowledge. Business women app. Sent business tips. Woman didn’t know what capital was, or P&L. Way of communicating info to people who wouldn’t otherwise have it. 1000 women in 50 countries, teamed up with a mentor.

    World is such a small place if you use technology to reach out to others.

    What do you think of the challenges for women today? Contradictions. Come so far in some ways. Contradictions of female life in the digital age. If had equality, will don’t need IWD. Nowhere that is the case. Economic participation 60%, political participation 20%. Misrepresentation. Both ways, e.g one woman is a CEO. Film Missrepresentation. What young girls and boys see. Not conducive to healthy relations between men and women. Cannot carry on hurling abuse at people because sitting at our desks and it doesn’t matter.

    22% in Westminster, why is it still so bad? Rwanda 60% – will have to start having quotas for men! Lol! Tony Blair did all women short lists. Employment tribunal ruled discrimination against men, Labour Party still does, other parties reluctant. Men worry about taking their jobs, but it’s not about guaranteed jobs, but about competence, who can do the best job?

    Have to do something about it. Cannot sit there and think it is acceptable. It isn’t. Need role models.

    Very positive. Think despite everything, think for daughter things are going to be a lot better, not least because of technology. Across the world. Hard for someone not to see that things could be better. And men, can’t so it without men thinking the world could be a better place, relationship equal based on mutual support. If we can do that the future is great.

    Anne Marie and Mark How

    Mark

    Work in Ads not just tech. In communications, sometimes companies get their communications wrong. Tech is for everyone. 3 things to start with – when Tim Berners Lee invented the Internet, said it was for everyone. Googles mission is to organize the worlds info. Make it universally accessible and useful. Still 5bn people who don’t have access. Creating great pathways for equality – enabler, organizer, setting pace that women can start to outstrip men in. Enables work life balance, and screwing up work life balance. Can be always on. Be able to keep up, have a voice, learn study, get info wherever you are that otherwise you were never able to get. Think about Arab spring, wouldn’t have happened without Internet, YouTube, social media. Internet economy 10% of GDP in the UK. Not just access, also small businesses, that have been so successful they have changed the face of sectors. Organizer of day to day life. Creates safety and a better organized world. Nest not a fire alarm business, remote control of environment, get out the house more. Enable ability to let you know when out of milk, tell person closest. Pace. Pace of change, in education, 60% of grads women, only 17% of Cs grads women. Ability to learn use through social media, women use social media more, buying more online, having voice heard more online.

    AMI

    Little Stemettes. All about the girls going into stem. Was 13% going in, girls outperform girls, these industries are exciting. 2/3 graduate in CS drop out. Don’t do it, those that do, don’t stay. Lots of reasons. Susan Greenfield, writing the same research for 30 years. Put together solution, build a solution. Address girls wanting to go into stem. Expose women to role models, find it fulfilling. Send message that it is getting better. Raise their confidence, important in solving this problem. Not feel imposter syndrome.

    There is a pay gap. Smaller in stem. First two years same, then it widens. Product. Pinking and shrinking now not acceptable. Tech and STEM is a better way to leverage and appreciate the perspective of women. Intro tech to rural India. Knock on affect of quality.

    4th wave feminism, where did 3rd wave go? We have a voice, people can point out when there is inequality.

    Take on where we are in 2014

    Thought-provoking. Complexity for women in terms of no one condition for female kind. Gets parcelled up into neat boxes, but it doesn’t fit. We want to keep that debate parcelled up. Need to find integration in everything. Talk about work life integration. Dis-intermediates traditional view of how you have to operate. Integration of generations of women. Some challenges same, some new challenge. Integrate, get them to understand, powerful. School kids powerful, because didn’t edit themselves. Curious, just put it on the table. Self editing.

    Whole discussion is irrelevant if we don’t remember why we are having it. To get women into senior leadership. Whole thing about setting role models, we can have this conversation about.

    Talk about challenges. But we don’t say how much we love it. Talk about that, how much influence we have. -address pipeline, This isn’t solving itself. We have to be prepared to move it in the right direction.

    Rebelled against being a role model. Resented have to be a role model because of the job I’m doing. Do have to, on many levels. Men too. Democratizing work and making it gender less, value people for who they are and what they bring.

    Share more of own stories and own styles. If do it, can be humbling to find out how much people get out of it.

    Needed to get over self, have fabulous job, get over having to talk about it. Impostor syndrome, being more reluctant to talk about it. If you get to that position, have responsibility to improve the world you work in. Have to break through the rubbish.

    Merger with HBOS. Need confidence in own abilities, but don’t need to behave like a man. Haven’t seen a lot of overt, but paternalism. Expect to play little woman, or be differential. Inspired by younger women, who won’t do it. Be confident and capable, get to positions in, because good at job.

    Exec committee at Lloyd’s 50:50. Conversation changed, feels more comfortable. Changes the way that everyone behaves. Male only pitches have started to feel odd. Male colleague pointed it out.

    Ask headhunters for balance. Have to choose the right candidate.

    “Only housewives in Gloucestershire”

    Recruitment not the vanguard of this!

    What and how, if not careful screen out difference. Including thinking differently. Characteristics that you’ve decided you value, shape the short list.

    Being mindful about sending emails over evening and weekend to not make other people work. Conscious degenderizing of approach, flexible work open to everyone.

    What wouldn’t you do again?

    In that environment, shouldn’t be required to do any more than already. Left out of football conversations, lonely, hard. Wished been herself earlier, but don’t know how would have done that. Not easy. Mentoring would have helped.

    Men expected to make the coffee. Aggressive environment. Clique who went to bar. You can fight an environment but sometimes better to move on and find an environment that will suit you better. Find women who will support you.

    Hard to advise, own journey is own journey. Coloured by joining at 18 on a level training scheme. Got voice that says don’t have to be the same as everyone else, voice that says are you good enough to be here? Do you have a right to be at that table? Got to point, felt liberated and thought sod it. Be in the conversation, speak up. If it lands well, good, if not, you will get over it.

  • #ModevUX Design, Device, Delight

    #ModevUX Design, Device, Delight

    apripoko robot
    Credit: Pink Tentacle

    Design to Delight

    • Personalised.
    • Responsive to orientation, tap and gesture.
    • Culturally relevant.

    Shared context is not just about sharing, about grind between designers and developers, “keeps your friends close and your developers closer”.

    Sharing context:

    • Early and frequent collaboration.
    • Design considering development.
    • Implement considering user experience.
    • Having trouble? Colocate!

    Get to point where everyone has a common expectation.

    Build a device specific experience.

    Design for reality. Don’t let technology drive your design, what that really means is don’t let developers drive your design, but absolutely technology is going to influence your design. You will run into walls, these walls aren’t make believe, you won’t be able to get around them.

    Device reality:

    • Physical size and orientation.
    • Pixel dimensions and density.
    • Network and disk IO.
    • Processor speed.
    • Available memory (main and video).
    • Device platform.

    Native applications do better with animation, handle things better, because they get you closer to the hardware. HTML is a very abstract platform. It’s important to help devs and designers understand breaking point of device. Ask: how far can we push it?

    As you download images to the device, it will download and try and load them. It will only be able to do a little bit at a time. So when the user scrolls, if they scroll too fast, webkit won’t be able to render. What wound up doing was finding faster ways to paint to the screen. Showed placeholders first, wait to do activities until the user stops moving – this is viewport based.

    Design for Time

    It’s not about making something that will be relevant in 10 years, as you’re building the interactions in applications, plan for time, because even micro interactions take time. In prototypes, when the user clicks things happen very fast, this can build an expectation about that. That time wasn’t accounted for in the beginning. If that had been accounted for, it would feel more relevant and applicable.

    • Rather than build to best case and recover, build to a realistic case and improve.
    • Avoid chasing unicorns.
    • Beware of immediate content updates.
    • Plan for graceful introduction of resources over time.
    • Preload carefully.

    What are the rules regarding when to update the application? This are design problems. Need both design and dev discuss upfront, if left it to devs it will be left to the end and will just pop in. Find ways to address these issues early on.

    Keep in mind: collaboration, innovate within constraints, plan for time.

  • #GHC13: Panel on Entrpreneurship

    #GHC13: Panel on Entrpreneurship

    baby duck
    Credit: PixaBay / PublicDomainPictures

    One of the things I really liked about this session was that it was three older women, and not all of them lived in the Valley (sadly I can’t find the description of the panel or the panelists). So much of what I read and hear about tech startups is SV based, that it’s extremely refreshing to hear an outside perspective!

    Advice from Founder.

    • Don’t start with an exit strategy.
    • 5m users and no money is not a business, it’s a hobby.
    • Aim for happy users and customers.
    • Doing a startup is like sprinting a marathon.
    • Can’t have work life balance at a startup. It’s not 9-5, but nor is it 8 hours a day. It’s not for the faint of heart.
    • It will suck you in and take over who you are.
    • When you hire someone you own their pay check. You don’t want to be responsible for them starving.
    • When you hire a board, it’s like a marriage where they can divorce you but you can’t divorce them.
    • Board can kick out founders at any time. It’s really hard for founders to buy out a board.
    • You think you are ready to launch – make sure you have a great idea. Get buy-in from your family. Gives the example of making her son a cofounder.
    • Build a strong team around you, you don’t want to be alone.
    • Objections to having a cofounder is splitting equity, but remember 100% of nothing is nothing.
    • Cofounder needs to be someone you will listen to. Sometimes you’ll be wrong.
    • Almost everything in tech can be built to some approximation, but not everything should be – because no-one will pay for it.
    • In enterprise, have to consider if it is 10x faster. The advantage has to be an order of magnitude better, otherwise not worth the switch.
    • Some things should be built, but not at that time. Gives example of first company, cloud. Timing was a big ingredient (she was too early).
    • Enterprise space, need 10-20 customers. Consumer products, need hundreds.
    • Raise seed money and experiment a lot. No real money until a few million customers, experience with engagement, retention.
    • If you don’t get negative feedback, either you are not listening or someone is being nice to you.
    • Good ideas fail big or win super big.
    • Get intelligence about what other companies are doing. Worry about competing with big companies.
    • Avoid the drive to zero (e.g. cloud). Need to be so differentiated that it won’t be commoditised soon.
    • Don’t wait for the moment where you just know; this is mostly not what happens.
    • If when frustrated, instead of complaining, you take action; you’re an entrepreneur. You can do this even if you have a job. It’s more of an attitude than DNA.
    • To start a company you need an idea.

    Advice from VC.

    • Look for secrets.
    • Big companies are already working on the obvious ideas. Not a good idea for a startup company.
    • Secrets may look like bad ideas.
    • Look for founders who know the tech better than anyone, understand the environment really well. Had a personal experience, e.g. Lyft came from founder experience in Zimbabwe [story].
    • Believe something that none else believes. E.g. of Salesforce, really hard to get funding because regular VCs didn’t believe that anyone would store that kind of information with anyone else.
    • Look for idea that upsets the norms and challenges convention, e.g. AirBnB creates experience around travel different from staying at the DoubleTree. The pitch sounds ridiculous.
    • VCs are sometimes too old for new ideas. You wouldn’t do that, but would others? New York AirBnB stats are incredible [AirBnB stats page].

    Joanna on Entrepreneur Qualities

    • Brimming in confidence.
    • Loves to be out the box, “not sure how many of you think you are in a box”.
    • Passionate.
    • Risk-taker.
    • Perpetually interested in everything.
    • People-oriented problem solver.
    • Great storyteller.
    • Leads by example.
    • Knows when you get expert experience.
    • Tolerates failure well.

    Paula on Entrepreneur Qualities

    • You get as much joy out of the idea as you do in bringing it to life.
    • “Everyone has fabulous ideas, not many people act on them”. It’s not just about the idea, but also about the discipline to act on it.
    • How to get joy out of using the things you build.
    • You cannot imagine sitting on a good idea and not taking action.
    • You reserve the right to get smarter and learn.
    • You cannot stop yourself thinking about how things could be better, and then work on making them better.
    • Product genius is something that cannot be taught. Tech founder is best suited to track those trends and follow accordingly.